|That old saying comes to mind: If it waddles like a duck its probably a duck
|After ten years and a great deal of research, it still looks like this building was professionally rigged to fall.
Colin does not
support the anti-
There is no
need for them.
9/11 Truth: What Happened to Building 7
|COULD THE COMMENTS DURING THE LAST FIVE SECONDS OF THIS VIDEO (Above) BE THE
REASON FOR THE ‘PULLING’ OF THE WTC BUILDING 7? The evidence and case files of the huge
corruptions just beginning to come to light and which in part have direct connections with todays
GONE FOR EVER WAS THE SECRET CASE FILES ON CORPORATE FRAUD INCLUDING
WORLDCOM AND ENRON AND SOME STOCK FRAUD AND THE MULTI-BILLION CALIFORNIAN
ENERGY SWINDLE. MULTI-BILLION DOLLARS CAN BUY YOU WHAT EVER YOU WANT INCLUDING
A LARGER THAN LIFE DEMOLITION JOB TO REMOVE FOR GOOD ALL THE EVIDENCE THAT
COULD UNMASK THESE EVIL EMPIRES……………ASK OURSELVES AGAIN: WHO IS IT THAN RUNS
9/11 Explosive Connections - The 9/11 Masterminds
An E-mail from my friend Peter Sorensen
BUILDING #7 WTC
Where I was when Pearl Harbor was bombed, Kennedy was shot, & on 9-11
I don’t actually remember when the Japanese attacked Pearl, but I was in my mother’s womb at the
time, and Mom often reminded me of that.
On the 22nd of November 1963 I was aboard a bus going across town in Manhattan when someone
got on board and shouted that Kennedy had just been shot. I got off at the next stop and went into
an Irish bar that happened to be there to watch the news (Dan Rather in tears).
Then, on 9-11 I was driving around Wiltshire hunting for a farm where I could make a crop circle for
a TV program. The London producer for the company got a call from his wife telling him about the
World Trade Center.
Like me you’re probably saturated by the media coverage of this tragic anniversary, but I’ve given a
lot of thought to the matter, and today I’d like to tell you about a remarkable parallel between Pearl
Harbor and 9-11 which I’ve never heard anybody else mention.
When the Nazis were rolling across Europe in 1941 a great many Americans were understandably
against getting into another European war – while a few even supported Germany (such and George
Bush’s grandfather!). But others perceived the grave danger to the United States if the Third Reich
took control of Europe – President Roosevelt for one.
Now, those of you who haven’t heard of the following may snort in disbelief, but I’ve seen some eye-
opening documentaries presenting evidence that FDR knew the Japanese were planning to wipe out
our navy on that day, and he let them attack. And it makes sense! (You might want to Google for
evidence pro and con.) He knew that such a disaster would swing public opinion in favor of going to
war. Good thing he did, considering where we’d all be if we’d let Hitler have his way. (The President
did covertly order all our most important ships out of the harbor before the strike so our Pacific Fleet
was not badly diminished.)
“Follow the money” is shrewd advice, but when something occurs which involves a huge change in
public opinion, we should say, follow the advantage. Pearl certainly was to Roosevelt’s advantage.
And 9-11 was very much to George Bush’s advantage!
So what follows is extremely interesting:
Many of the people who promoted Bush Jr. for the Republican candidacy were with a right wing think
tank called The Project for the New American Century (PNAC), and when The Thief took the White
House, no less than seven top men from that organization b ecame part of his inner circle – including
Vice-President Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz.
Fundamental to the PNAC were the view that "American leadership is both good for America and
good for the world" and support for "a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity." [Quotes
are from the PNAC Statement of Principles on their website in 1997.]
Then in 1998 they “urged President Clinton to remove Saddam Hussein from power using U.S.
diplomatic, political, and military power. The signers argued that Saddam would pose a threat to the
United States, and oil resources in the region, if he succeeded in maintaining what they asserted was
a stockpile of Weapons of Mass Destruction.” [Quote from Wikipedia.]
I heard recently on the BBC that Clinton didn’t agree at first, and perused Osama instead (in 1998!).
Another quote from PNAC’s website in 1997 Rebuilding America's Defenses states that the core
missions of the U.S. military should include to:”fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major
Damn familiar, eh (apart from the “decisively win” bit)!
NOW HERE’S THE BOMBSHELL:
Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force",
includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change,
is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor"
So, my friends, what I think happened, is that the Bush administration intentionally disregarded Bin
Laden, and when they learned that hijackers were planning to crash into the Twin Towers, they didn’t
lift a finger to stop them. Just like FDR! But unlike Pearl Harbor, there were no Nazis that had to be
stopped – just a desire to make America number one in world again like the glory days of WW-II.
I like to joke that Little Bush couldn’t think himself out of a paper bag, so I doubt he knew anything
prior to 9-11 – but I’ll bet that Cheney did!
That’s the important part of this email, folks. You may want to go away and read something else
now because I’m just going to reiterate why I think that World Trade Center building number Seven is
the big smoking gun proving that the collapse of all three buildings was a set up demolition job.
Just in a nutshell because I’ve said it all before, Number 7 wasn’t hit by a plane, there were only
some mysterious small fires inside, and yet it collapsed in seconds into a neat pile like both of the
towers. (If you don’t know what I’m talking about you must look at the attached 12 second video of
the collapse) It collapsed despite the building being made of especially thick steel because it was to
be the mayor’s fortified office in time of war. And no steel beamed building constructed since WW-II
has collapsed from fire!
There is tons of other stuff that stinks about 9-11. But if building #7 was a controlled demolition,
then the whole thing was an inside job.
Even if it wasn’t, Bush caused far, far, FAR more damage to our freedom than Al Qaida! And that’s
saying nothing about the thousands of our troops and the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi and Afghan
civilians lives wasted in the madman’s pursuit of power (and mountains money in it for his friends in
the military/industrial complex)!
Written in memory for the lost in the emergency services as well as those in the Twin Towers.
PS: I’ve attached a photo of me holding a sign that I carried in the Los Angeles protest march on the
day of Bu$h’s innaugeration.
Peter ducks taking a stand on 9-11 conspiracy!
I wish I could say with certainty that I have decided one way to the other about the 9-11 “mystery” (as
I’m calling it now). In addition to reading websites strongly promoting both of the two sides, and
having some friends arguing vehemently one way or the other, I’m afraid I cannot say with certainty
that one is clearly right and the other foolish bullshit. It’s surprising that a conclusion didn’t jump out
after a quick glance at the evidence – and a longer look didn’t help!
There are two websites, both one of which might have swayed me to their way of thinking if I had
only looked at one. Against there being any govt. plot is the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=861610), while smelling a
conspiratorial rat are the Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth (AE911Truth). Both are large
groups of experts, and reading only one side one would easily be convinced that the answer is clear.
(If you are already convinced, I suggest you study the website of the opposing view.)
With friends on both sides (and as I said a recently, I don’t have any stupid friends!) and with
professional experts in disagreement, I had to throw my hands up in despair –- though not without
having a good laugh at the certitude being expressed by all of them!
A Parallel Solution?
One refuge for me (here I will loose many of my readers!) is the notion of parallel worlds.
Consider the dichotomy of crop circle beliefs. When I came to the solid conclusion that the circles
were being flattened by humans, I was struck by the equally powerful belief of some friends who
insisted that something else was making the circles. After initially dismissing their position as
delusional I began to consider the possibility that they may be tuned into a parallel space-time where
ETs or angels were projecting the designs into the crop.
I don’t think that’s totally crazy because these days in cosmology there is the popular theory that
there are an infinite number of parallel universes, and there may be wormholes (or something) that
linking the various worlds. Although a wormhole is generally thought to require a near infinite amount
of gravity to form, I am open to the possibility that there could be “mental wormholes” that folks might
pass thru without even knowing it.
I don’t actually think that is the most likely explanation for the crop circles or the 9-11 mystery, but I
have a fondness for the possibility! The greater probability is that there are definite yeay or neigh
answers to these kerfuddles, but in the case of 9-11 clarity eludes me. If I kept after the elusive
solution for weeks or years I would probably catch the truth, but, frankly I’m sick and tired of the chase!
Of more interest to me now are the reasons that almost everyone seems so certain that they have
found the Truth.
The thing that colors almost everyone’s perceptions in their faith (or lack of) that the government
could be guilty of such a terrible thing as collusion (or worse) in the matter. Even many of those who
think the Bush administration was a pack of bastards are reluctant to go so far as to think they could
have done nothing to stop an attack.
I’m not one of those. I think that the President (so-called) and his henchmen were (are) sociopaths,
totally devoid of empathy and no more caring for other humans than a serial killer.
The BBC recently reported that a group of psychologists found that one in 100 people is a sociopath
(a person totally devoid of empathy), one in ten company executives is, and that one in FOUR
national leaders is! Sounds right to me. Look at Putin, Asad, and virtually every dictator past and
present – they have no qualms about killing hundreds of thousands when it suits their whims.
Two Pieces of Evidence to Consider
I went into this exercise intending to find the answer to 9-11 and display the evidence. Since I was
unable to come to a certain conclusion I will give just one tidbit from each side on the matter of the
collapse of World Trade Center Building Number Seven – which is the smoking gun (on not smoking
gun) of the mystery.
In favor of the WTC disaster being entirely Al Qaeda’s doing is the large fire burning in #7 for many
hours (see photo). There was no water pressure so the fire sprinklers were not functioning and Fire
Department resources were totally consumed elsewhere. Believers say the blaze went on long
enough to soften the steel beams in a critical part of the structure. When that gave way the rest of
the structure went like a house of cards.
On the other hand, there is a photo of the wreckage of #7 taken a day or two afterward by someone
from the building next door. It shows the ends of thick beams looking for all the world as if they were
cut by explosives so hot that they melted the steel (thermite?). Notice also in “photo 2” that there is a
whole row of beams apparently cut through at a point which would be midway between floors. They
don’t look bent or distorted by the heat of a fire at all.
1500 Experts Agree - Yes, it looks like a duck
|My thanks to:
|"Decent people want to do
what is right out of respect
for all of those innocent
people who lost their lives