Bookmark and Share
US AND ISRAEL ALLEGEDLY RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPER DESTRUCTIVE
WORM VIRUS ATTACK ON IRAN'S NUCLEAR SITE - THE VIRUS NOW
AVAILABLE FOR COUNTER ATTACKS - WHAT NOW?
New York Times Article follows these comments by Colin Andrews
Posted January 17, 2011

NEW YORK TIMES REPORT (below) THAT ISRAEL AND THE USA HAVE SERIOUSLY DAMAGED NUCLEAR
CENTRIFUGES IN IRAN WITH A COMPUTER SUPER WORM VIRUS ATTACK.

NOW THE VIRUS HAS SPREAD AND AVAILABLE TO THOSE WHO KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING TO
MODIFY IT FOR COUNTER ATTACKS AND SO NOW WHAT?  AN ALL OUT ATTACK ON THE UNITED
STATES OR ISRAEL'S OWN POWER GRID OR NUCLEAR FACILITIES, PERHAPS OUR MISSILES. EXPERTS
SAY IT COULD BE USED TO CLOSE DOWN JUST ABOUT ANYTHING THAT RECEIVES COMPUTER
COMMANDS TO OPERATE.

THIS MADNESS HAS BEEN LET LOOSE BY INSANE INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT IT SEEMS RATIONAL
ASSESSMENT FOR THE FUTURE. THESE  MODERN DAY ELECTRONIC BOMBS HAVE BEEN SET LOOSE
BY SOME OF THE SAME ENTITIES WHO ARE TRYING THEIR DAMNEDEST TO CONVINCE US OF THE
THREATS AND DANGERS POSED BY
WIKILEAKS AND JULIAN ASSANGE!.

THESE CRAZED PEOPLE WILL DESTROY HUMANITY ITSELF WITH SUCH IRRESPONSIBLE BEHAVIOR.  
THE USE OF THESE KINDS OF
NON LETHAL WEAPONS WILL COME HOME TO HAUNT US ALL, THAT I
SADLY BELIEVE IS TRUE.  

COMPUTER HACKERS FROM THE USA ARE FROM THE SAME GOVERNMENT WHO SEEK TO IMPRISON
A KID IN ENGLAND FOR HACKING INTO THEIR OWN COMPUTERS LOOKING FOR UFO SECRETS AND
THE SAME GUYS WHO HAVE IN ISOLATION RIGHT NOW ONE OF THEIR OWN FOR ALLEGEDLY
DOWNLOADING  DATA FROM GOVERNMENT COMPUTERS AND PASSING THEM TO
WIKILEAKS
BECAUSE OF WHAT HE SAW IN THE SYSTEM.  

OBVIOUSLY WE ALL WANT A REASONABLE AND PEACEFUL RESOLUTION TO THE IRANIAN NUCLEAR
PROBLEM BUT THIS UNBELIEVABLY IRRESPONSIBLE ACTION ISN'T THE WAY - THIS IS WAR AND WHILE
A BRIGHT FLASH AND LOUD BANG DID NOT TAKE PLACE (YET), THE CONSEQUENCES HAVE THE
POTENTIAL TO BE EVEN WORSE.  

Forms part of the 2012 Debate - Colin Andrews
MORE
INSANITY
Israeli Test on Worm Called Crucial in Iran Nuclear Delay
By WILLIAM J. BROAD, JOHN MARKOFF and DAVID E. SANGER
Published: January 15, 2011

This article is by William J. Broad, John Markoff and David E. Sanger.

The Dimona complex in the Negev desert is famous as the heavily guarded heart of Israel’s never-
acknowledged nuclear arms program, where neat rows of factories make atomic fuel for the arsenal.

Over the past two years, according to intelligence and military experts familiar with its operations,
Dimona has taken on a new, equally secret role — as a critical testing ground in a joint American and
Israeli effort to undermine Iran’s efforts to make a bomb of its own.

Behind Dimona’s barbed wire, the experts say, Israel has spun nuclear centrifuges virtually identical
to Iran’s at Natanz, where Iranian scientists are struggling to enrich uranium. They say Dimona tested
the effectiveness of the Stuxnet computer worm, a destructive program that appears to have wiped
out roughly a fifth of Iran’s nuclear centrifuges and helped delay, though not destroy, Tehran’s ability
to make its first nuclear arms.

“To check out the worm, you have to know the machines,” said an American expert on nuclear
intelligence. “The reason the worm has been effective is that the Israelis tried it out.”

Though American and Israeli officials refuse to talk publicly about what goes on at Dimona, the
operations there, as well as related efforts in the United States, are among the newest and strongest
clues suggesting that the virus was designed as an American-Israeli project to sabotage the Iranian
program.

In recent days, the retiring chief of Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency, Meir Dagan, and Secretary of
State Hillary Rodham Clinton separately announced that they believed Iran’s efforts had been set
back by several years. Mrs. Clinton cited American-led sanctions, which have hurt Iran’s ability to buy
components and do business around the world.

The gruff Mr. Dagan, whose organization has been accused by Iran of being behind the deaths of
several Iranian scientists, told the Israeli Knesset in recent days that Iran had run into technological
difficulties that could delay a bomb until 2015. That represented a sharp reversal from Israel’s long-
held argument that Iran was on the cusp of success.

The biggest single factor in putting time on the nuclear clock appears to be Stuxnet, the most
sophisticated cyberweapon ever deployed.

In interviews over the past three months in the United States and Europe, experts who have picked
apart the computer worm describe it as far more complex — and ingenious — than anything they had
imagined when it began circulating around the world, unexplained, in mid-2009.

Many mysteries remain, chief among them, exactly who constructed a computer worm that appears to
have several authors on several continents. But the digital trail is littered with intriguing bits of
evidence.

In early 2008 the German company Siemens cooperated with one of the United States’ premier
national laboratories, in Idaho, to identify the vulnerabilities of computer controllers that the company
sells to operate industrial machinery around the world — and that American intelligence agencies
have identified as key equipment in Iran’s enrichment facilities.

Seimens says that program was part of routine efforts to secure its products against cyberattacks.
Nonetheless, it gave the Idaho National Laboratory — which is part of the Energy Department,
responsible for America’s nuclear arms — the chance to identify well-hidden holes in the Siemens
systems that were exploited the next year by Stuxnet.

The worm itself now appears to have included two major components. One was designed to send Iran’
s nuclear centrifuges spinning wildly out of control. Another seems right out of the movies: The
computer program also secretly recorded what normal operations at the nuclear plant looked like,
then played those readings back to plant operators, like a pre-recorded security tape in a bank heist,
so that it would appear that everything was operating normally while the centrifuges were actually
tearing themselves apart.

The attacks were not fully successful: Some parts of Iran’s operations ground to a halt, while others
survived, according to the reports of international nuclear inspectors. Nor is it clear the attacks are
over: Some experts who have examined the code believe it contains the seeds for yet more versions
and assaults.

“It’s like a playbook,” said Ralph Langner, an independent computer security expert in Hamburg,
Germany, who was among the first to decode Stuxnet. “Anyone who looks at it carefully can build
something like it.” Mr. Langner is among the experts who expressed fear that the attack had
legitimized a new form of industrial warfare, one to which the United States is also highly vulnerable.

Officially, neither American nor Israeli officials will even utter the name of the malicious computer
program, much less describe any role in designing it.

But Israeli officials grin widely when asked about its effects. Mr. Obama’s chief strategist for
combating weapons of mass destruction, Gary Samore, sidestepped a Stuxnet question at a recent
conference about Iran, but added with a smile: “I’m glad to hear they are having troubles with their
centrifuge machines, and the U.S. and its allies are doing everything we can to make it more
complicated.”

In recent days, American officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity have said in interviews
that they believe Iran’s setbacks have been underreported. That may explain why Mrs. Clinton
provided her public assessment while traveling in the Middle East last week.

By the accounts of a number of computer scientists, nuclear enrichment experts and former officials,
the covert race to create Stuxnet was a joint project between the Americans and the Israelis, with
some help, knowing or unknowing, from the Germans and the British.

The project’s political origins can be found in the last months of the Bush administration. In January
2009, The New York Times reported that Mr. Bush authorized a covert program to undermine the
electrical and computer systems around Natanz, Iran’s major enrichment center. President Obama,
first briefed on the program even before taking office, sped it up, according to officials familiar with
the administration’s Iran strategy. So did the Israelis, other officials said. Israel has long been seeking
a way to cripple Iran’s capability without triggering the opprobrium, or the war, that might follow an
overt military strike of the kind they conducted against nuclear facilities in Iraq in 1981 and Syria in
2007.

Two years ago, when Israel still thought its only solution was a military one and approached Mr. Bush
for the bunker-busting bombs and other equipment it believed it would need for an air attack, its
officials told the White House that such a strike would set back Iran’s programs by roughly three
years. Its request was turned down.

Now, Mr. Dagan’s statement suggests that Israel believes it has gained at least that much time,
without mounting an attack. So does the Obama administration.

For years, Washington’s approach to Tehran’s program has been one of attempting “to put time on
the clock,” a senior administration official said, even while refusing to discuss Stuxnet. “And now, we
have a bit more.”

Finding Weaknesses

Paranoia helped, as it turns out.

Years before the worm hit Iran, Washington had become deeply worried about the vulnerability of the
millions of computers that run everything in the United States from bank transactions to the power
grid.

Computers known as controllers run all kinds of industrial machinery. By early 2008, the Department
of Homeland Security had teamed up with the Idaho National Laboratory to study a widely used
Siemens controller known as P.C.S.-7, for Process Control System 7. Its complex software, called
Step 7, can run whole symphonies of industrial instruments, sensors and machines.

The vulnerability of the controller to cyberattack was an open secret. In July 2008, the Idaho lab and
Siemens teamed up on a PowerPoint presentation on the controller’s vulnerabilities that was made to
a conference in Chicago at Navy Pier, a top tourist attraction.

“Goal is for attacker to gain control,” the July paper said in describing the many kinds of maneuvers
that could exploit system holes. The paper was 62 pages long, including pictures of the controllers as
they were examined and tested in Idaho.

In a statement on Friday, the Idaho National Laboratory confirmed that it formed a partnership with
Siemens but said it was one of many with manufacturers to identify cybervulnerabilities. It argued that
the report did not detail specific flaws that attackers could exploit. But it also said it could not
comment on the laboratory’s classified missions, leaving unanswered the question of whether it
passed what it learned about the Siemens systems to other parts of the nation’s intelligence
apparatus.

The presentation at the Chicago conference, which recently disappeared from a Siemens Web site,
never discussed specific places where the machines were used.

But Washington knew. The controllers were critical to operations at Natanz, a sprawling enrichment
site in the desert. “If you look for the weak links in the system,” said one former American official, “this
one jumps out.”

Controllers, and the electrical regulators they run, became a focus of sanctions efforts. The trove of
State Department cables made public by WikiLeaks describes urgent efforts in April 2009 to stop a
shipment of Siemens controllers, contained in 111 boxes at the port of Dubai, in the United Arab
Emirates. They were headed for Iran, one cable said, and were meant to control “uranium enrichment
cascades” — the term for groups of spinning centrifuges.

Subsequent cables showed that the United Arab Emirates blocked the transfer of the Siemens
computers across the Strait of Hormuz to Bandar Abbas, a major Iranian port.

Only months later, in June, Stuxnet began to pop up around the globe. The Symantec Corporation, a
maker of computer security software and services based in Silicon Valley, snared it in a global
malware collection system. The worm hit primarily inside Iran, Symantec reported, but also in time
appeared in India, Indonesia and other countries.

But unlike most malware, it seemed to be doing little harm. It did not slow computer networks or wreak
general havoc.

That deepened the mystery.

A ‘Dual Warhead’

No one was more intrigued than Mr. Langner, a former psychologist who runs a small computer
security company in a suburb of Hamburg. Eager to design protective software for his clients, he had
his five employees focus on picking apart the code and running it on the series of Siemens
controllers neatly stacked in racks, their lights blinking.

He quickly discovered that the worm only kicked into gear when it detected the presence of a specific
configuration of controllers, running a set of processes that appear to exist only in a centrifuge plant.
“The attackers took great care to make sure that only their designated targets were hit,” he said. “It
was a marksman’s job.”

For example, one small section of the code appears designed to send commands to 984 machines
linked together.

Curiously, when international inspectors visited Natanz in late 2009, they found that the Iranians had
taken out of service a total of exactly 984 machines that had been running the previous summer.

But as Mr. Langner kept peeling back the layers, he found more — what he calls the “dual warhead.”
One part of the program is designed to lie dormant for long periods, then speed up the machines so
that the spinning rotors in the centrifuges wobble and then destroy themselves. Another part, called a
“man in the middle” in the computer world, sends out those false sensor signals to make the system
believe everything is running smoothly. That prevents a safety system from kicking in, which would
shut down the plant before it could self-destruct.

“Code analysis makes it clear that Stuxnet is not about sending a message or proving a concept,” Mr.
Langner later wrote. “It is about destroying its targets with utmost determination in military style.”

This was not the work of hackers, he quickly concluded. It had to be the work of someone who knew
his way around the specific quirks of the Siemens controllers and had an intimate understanding of
exactly how the Iranians had designed their enrichment operations.

In fact, the Americans and the Israelis had a pretty good idea.

Testing the Worm

Perhaps the most secretive part of the Stuxnet story centers on how the theory of cyberdestruction
was tested on enrichment machines to make sure the malicious software did its intended job.

The account starts in the Netherlands. In the 1970s, the Dutch designed a tall, thin machine for
enriching uranium. As is well known, A. Q. Khan, a Pakistani metallurgist working for the Dutch, stole
the design and in 1976 fled to Pakistan.

The resulting machine, known as the P-1, for Pakistan’s first-generation centrifuge, helped the
country get the bomb. And when Dr. Khan later founded an atomic black market, he illegally sold P-1’
s to Iran, Libya, and North Korea.

The P-1 is more than six feet tall. Inside, a rotor of aluminum spins uranium gas to blinding speeds,
slowly concentrating the rare part of the uranium that can fuel reactors and bombs.

How and when Israel obtained this kind of first-generation centrifuge remains unclear, whether from
Europe, or the Khan network, or by other means. But nuclear experts agree that Dimona came to
hold row upon row of spinning centrifuges.

“They’ve long been an important part of the complex,” said Avner Cohen, author of “The Worst-Kept
Secret” (2010), a book about the Israeli bomb program, and a senior fellow at the Monterey Institute
of International Studies. He added that Israeli intelligence had asked retired senior Dimona personnel
to help on the Iranian issue, and that some apparently came from the enrichment program.

“I have no specific knowledge,” Dr. Cohen said of Israel and the Stuxnet worm. “But I see a strong
Israeli signature and think that the centrifuge knowledge was critical.”

Another clue involves the United States. It obtained a cache of P-1’s after Libya gave up its nuclear
program in late 2003, and the machines were sent to the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in
Tennessee, another arm of the Energy Department.

By early 2004, a variety of federal and private nuclear experts assembled by the Central Intelligence
Agency were calling for the United States to build a secret plant where scientists could set up the P-1’
s and study their vulnerabilities. “The notion of a test bed was really pushed,” a participant at the C.I.
A. meeting recalled.

The resulting plant, nuclear experts said last week, may also have played a role in Stuxnet testing.

But the United States and its allies ran into the same problem the Iranians have grappled with: the P-
1 is a balky, badly designed machine. When the Tennessee laboratory shipped some of its P-1’s to
England, in hopes of working with the British on a program of general P-1 testing, they stumbled,
according to nuclear experts.

“They failed hopelessly,” one recalled, saying that the machines proved too crude and
temperamental to spin properly.

Dr. Cohen said his sources told him that Israel succeeded — with great difficulty — in mastering the
centrifuge technology. And the American expert in nuclear intelligence, who spoke on the condition of
anonymity, said the Israelis used machines of the P-1 style to test the effectiveness of Stuxnet.

The expert added that Israel worked in collaboration with the United States in targeting Iran, but that
Washington was eager for “plausible deniability.”

In November, the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, broke the country’s silence about the
worm’s impact on its enrichment program, saying a cyberattack had caused “minor problems with
some of our centrifuges.” Fortunately, he added, “our experts discovered it.”

The most detailed portrait of the damage comes from the Institute for Science and International
Security, a private group in Washington. Last month, it issued a lengthy Stuxnet report that said Iran’s
P-1 machines at Natanz suffered a series of failures in mid- to late 2009 that culminated in
technicians taking 984 machines out of action.

The report called the failures “a major problem” and identified Stuxnet as the likely culprit.

Stuxnet is not the only blow to Iran. Sanctions have hurt its effort to build more advanced (and less
temperamental) centrifuges. And last January, and again in November, two scientists who were
believed to be central to the nuclear program were killed in Tehran.

The man widely believed to be responsible for much of Iran’s program, Mohsen Fakrizadeh, a college
professor, has been hidden away by the Iranians, who know he is high on the target list.

Publicly, Israeli officials make no explicit ties between Stuxnet and Iran’s problems. But in recent
weeks, they have given revised and surprisingly upbeat assessments of Tehran’s nuclear status.

“A number of technological challenges and difficulties” have beset Iran’s program, Moshe Yaalon,
Israel’s minister of strategic affairs, told Israeli public radio late last month.

The troubles, he added, “have postponed the timetable.”

A version of this article appeared in print on January 16, 2011, on
page A1 of the New York edition.
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran
toured the Natanz plant in 2008.